Application of Approximate Equality for Reduction of Feature Vector Dimension
The Journal of Pattern Recognition Research (JPRR) provides an international forum for the electronic publication of high-quality research and industrial experience articles in all areas of pattern recognition, machine learning, and artificial intelligence. JPRR is committed to rigorous yet rapid reviewing. Final versions are published electronically
(ISSN 1558-884X) immediately upon acceptance.
Application of Approximate Equality for Reduction of Feature Vector Dimension
Kumar Sankar Ray, Srikanta Kolay
JPRR Vol 11, No 1 (2016); doi:10.13176/11.639 
Download
Kumar Sankar Ray, Srikanta Kolay
Abstract
Reduction of feature vector dimension is a problem of selecting the most informative features from an information system. Using rough set theory we can reduce the feature vector dimension when all the attribute values are crisp or discrete. For any information system or decision system, if attributes contain real-valued data, rough set theory cannot be applied directly. Fuzzy-rough set techniques may be applied on this kind of system to reduce the dimension. But, Fuzzy-rough set uses the concept of fuzzy-equivalence relation, which is not suitable to model approximate equality. In this paper we propose a new alternative method to reduce the dimension of feature vectors of a decision system where the attribute values may be discrete or real or even mixed in nature. To model approximate equality we first consider the intuitive relationship between distance measure and equality. Subsequently we fuzzify the distance measures to establish the degree of equality (or closeness) among feature vectors (objects or points). Finally we use the concept of alpha-cut to obtain equivalence relation based on which dimension of feature vectors can be reduced. We also compare the performance of the present method to reduce the feature vector dimension with those of principle component analysis, Kernel Principal Component Analysis and independent component analysis. In most of the cases the present method performs same or better than the other methods.
JPRR Vol 11, No 1 (2016); doi:10.13176/11.639 | Full Text  | Share this paper: